CY requests free use of community room (again again)

Cooperatively Yours is holding a meeting on June 1 in the community room, open to all cooperators, on a topic of general interest to all shareholders (East River’s pet policy). Once again we have laid out the funds for renting the room — $325 (plus a $200 refundable deposit) and are — once again — asking that the room be made available for free for this purpose.

In the past, the board and management have flip-flopped on this request, even once giving us the room for free “by mistake.” Last spring, the board replied to our request by saying that cooperators are not tenants, and therefore not protected by New York’s landlord-tenant laws, even though cooperators’ legal status as tenants is a central difference between a coop and a condo. In February, when I delivered a letter requesting free use of the room to every member of the board and house committee I received no official response at all (not even acknowledgement of receipt).

Might as well try again, right? Yesterday I emailed contact@coopvillage.coop, as well as the few board members who have made their email addresses public, with the request below. At the end of the day I received a phone call from Shulie Wollman, Assistant General Manager, who told me that he had spoken with board president Gary Altman who had decided that no refund would be made.

Here’s the request, with links to (ir)relevant laws:

Cooperatively Yours is holding a meeting on Monday, June 1 in the community room, open to all cooperators, to discuss the coop’s current pet policy and to develop potential alternatives to that policy that will be presented to shareholders and the board of directors.

I would like to request that the $325 fee for use of the community room for this meeting be refunded, not just as a matter of policy, but a matter of law.

As you may be aware, cooperators are both stockholders of a corporation and also tenants of that same corporation. Section 216 of the U.S. Code Title 26 defines owners in a cooperative housing corporation as “tenant-stockholders” (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/216). East River’s most recent audited financial statement refers to cooperators as “tenant-stockholders” no fewer than 23 times. All cooperators also sign a proprietary lease, which further determines their designation as tenants.

As such, cooperators enjoy the protection of New York’s Landlord-Tenant laws. This is a well-known distinction between coops and condos, and one of the primary legal advantages of buying a coop. Section 230 of those laws grants tenants the right to form and participate in “any group, committee or other organization formed to protect the rights of tenants” and “to meet without being required to pay a fee in any location on the premises including a community or social room” (http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/RPP/7/230).

Any clear reading of these laws leads to the conclusion that Cooperatively Yours must not be required to pay a fee to use the community room for discussions of general interest to all cooperators.

Cooperatively yours,
Jeremy Sherber.

Seward’s pet policy is mixed

Much like Hillman, Seward tries to have it both ways: officially prohibiting dogs and other pets while issuing regulations for those cooperators who are breaking the rules.

Seward’s policy starts out word-for-word the same as East River’s and Hillman’s — “the no-animal provision in this lease shall be deemed a substantial obligation of the Lessee’s tenancy” — but then adds some provisions:

  • Dogs must be registered annually, including certification of inoculations.
  • Dogs must be kept on a leash no longer than five feet.
  • Any waste must be disposed of properly.

Seward’s rules are less specific than Hillman’s recently adopted regulations (for example, Seward does not require a DNA sample to be submitted with registration as a way of identifying dog poop).

love-hate-orange

What is New York City’s pet law?

Imagine you have rented an apartment in the east village for 10 years in the 1980s, difficult times for the neighborhood. You have a dog and a cat, though your lease prohibits both. You have a professional but not friendly relationship with your landlord, who visits the building at least once a month.

As the area starts to clean up and housing prices start to go up, you notice your landlord around more often. He hires a crew to re-tile the entryway, repaint the front door, and fix the cracked concrete stoop. Then he sends you an eviction notice, with the cause being that you are harboring pets that are prohibited by your lease.

Really, he’s just trying to get rid of you so he can rent your apartment for more money. Lucky for you, there’s a law that says he can’t.

In 1983, New York City passed a law to protect tenants from exactly this scenario. The law states that any tenant who lives openly with a pet for 90 days, regardless of what’s in the lease, can not be evicted for that reason. If the landlord knows you have a dog and chooses to do nothing about it, he can’t suddenly turn around and kick you out.

That same law applies to our coop, and is a major reason why, even though we have a strict no-pet policy in our proprietary lease and house rules, there are still so many dogs (and cats, and fish) living at East River. Management needs to take action within 90 days of a tenant bringing home a pet or else lose the authority to do anything about it.

In fact, one of the important cases strengthening New York’s pet law was one that involved Seward Park. In 2002, a dog-owner facing eviction challenged management and won, with the appellate court saying that if porters, security guards, and other coop employees are aware of a pet’s presence, the managing agent does not need to personally be notified within 90 days.

At the time, Seward Park’s no-pet policy was exactly the same as ours is now.

love-hate-blue

Hillman adopted new dog policy last year

Hillman has had the exact same no-dog policy as East River. But starting in 2014, Hillman issued revised rules that, while not officially allowing dogs to live in the coop, seek to regulate the dogs that do live there. Namely:

  • Dogs in Hillman are required to be registered annually for $100 with a DNA sample that will allow feces to be identified if left on Hillman property.
  • Each apartment may have no more than one dog.
  • No dog may weigh more than 35 pounds.
  • Disruptive dogs may be denied registration.

You can read the full policy here.

Why create this seeming contradiction? A blanket no-pet policy is superseded by New York City law that prohibits landlords from evicting tenants who have lived openly with a pet for 90 days. That means that if a cooperator is not served with a notice within 90 days of bringing in a pet, management has no recourse at all. This new policy is meant to give the coop some additional control over which pets may be allowed.

love-hate-red

East River Coop policy on dogs

In preparation for our open meeting on June 1, let’s review our own official policy.

From the proprietary lease:

Dogs and Other Animals. No dogs or other animals or pets shall be kept or harbored in the Apartment, unless the Lessor’s prior written consent shall have been obtained in each instance. Violation by the Lessee of this provision shall constitute a breach of a substantial obligation of tenancy and of this lease.

The Lessee expressly agrees that the Lessor shall not be deemed to have waived the provisions of this Article by reason of having had notice or knowledge of a violation of such provisions unless (1) the Lessee has personally delivered written notice that the Lessee is harboring a pet to the Lessor’s management office and (2) the Manager of the Lessor has signed and dated a copy of that written notice to signify that he or she has received it. The Lessee further agrees that nothing in this Article shall be construed as a waiver of any of the Lessor’s rights hereunder or applicable law.

And, from the house rules:

27. Dogs and Other Animals. The Lessee agrees to comply with the provisions hereof prohibiting the harboring of dogs or other animals or pets. The Lessee understands that the harboring of such animals creates a substantial inconvenience for fellow lessees and for the Lessor’s staff. In particular, the Lessee recognizes that animals’ wastes foul the Development, that barking dogs can disturb other lessees and that large animals can frighten the many children and elderly residents of the Development. The Lessee hereby further agrees that the no-animal provision in this lease shall be deemed a substantial obligation of the Lessee’s tenancy.

love-hate-red

Do you love dogs? Do you hate dogs? Pick a side on June 1

love-hate

No topic ignites cooperators’ blood pressure like dogs. Love them, hate them, people have very strong feelings about whether dogs belong in our coop, and raising the topic at any annual meeting or meet-the-candidates night is a guaranteed show-stopper.

But being afraid to talk about something doesn’t make it go away. And over the last few years legal battles about dogs at East River have cost the coop over $1.2 million and made us the target of a federal anti-discrimination lawsuit. It’s time now to decide what pet policy is in the coop’s best interest, and the most effective way to enforce that policy.

Cooperatively Yours is hosting an open meeting for all cooperators on Monday, June 1 in the community room at 7:00 pm. The goal of this working session will be to develop two policy proposals that can be presented to all shareholders for a vote. Given the cost involved, this is a conversation all of us should be a part of.

Joe Hanania resigns from house committee

Joe Hanania resigned last week from the house committee, citing discontent with the committee’s powerlessness in the face of opposition from the board of directors.

Joe built his reputation in the neighborhood as an advocate for improved public transportation. He initiated a petition for a Grand Street ferry stop that attracted the attention of local politicians and recently received the stamp of approval from Mayor de Blasio.

hananiaJoe explained his resignation by pointing to the controversy around the board’s decision to renovate the community room without any input from cooperators. “The House Committee voted unanimously to send a flyer to all residents, soliciting ideas on renovation and what residents wanted,” said Joe. “After a phone call between the Presidents of the Board and the House Committee, however, that flyer never went out.”

“The President of the Board had promised to consult the Committee about plans to redo the Community Room before greenlighting the project. This never happened, either. Instead, the Board voted to fund a $73,000 renovation while showing us not a single rendering of what the room would look like.”

Joe also objected to the way cooperators were treated when they met in February to share ideas about how the community room might be renovated and better used:

“Rather than encouraging — or even listening to — this discussion and building a democratic consensus on what we Cooperators wanted, the Board charged those of us who met $300 plus for use of the room — and a week later pushed through its own plan. It was not that Board members did not like the ideas expressed; they never even listened, then let us know how little we matter while using our rent moneys to fund their scheme.”

“It seems obvious that the Board, which in the past it has threatened to abolish the House Committee, intimidated and ignored the House Committee, and then ignored the Cooperators when they separately met. I refuse to further waste my time in this charade, or to lend legitimacy to the Board’s actions.”

Joe was elected just this past December for his first term on the house committee. He received more votes than any other candidate.

Memo: Building 4 laundry room will be back online this weekend

Residents of building 4 received this email today:

May 21, 2015

FROM: HAROLD JACOB, GENERAL MANAGER

RE: BUILDING 4 LAUNDRY ROOM

After an arduous period of pipe and floor repair and replacement, we are happy to report the reopening of the laundry room in Building 4, on Friday, May 22, at 6 p.m.

As you know, Building 4 underwent a sewer line rupture requiring extensive replacement of the main sewer pipe for the entire building, coupled with the total rebuilding and replacement of all nine drain lines under the laundry room floor. It was a very big job and as the work proceeded underground we continued to find new problems and it was the determination of Management and the Board to fix and repair all these problems at one time.

Once the pipes had been removed and replaced, the floor in the laundry required new concrete and tiles. It was after that process that most of the laundry machines were placed back and connected. A few machines will not be able to be hooked up until June 3, but we wanted to reopen the room as soon as possible.

Due to the length of time these repairs took, we understand the frustration cooperators experienced not having access to their laundry room, but there was no alternative, and we wanted the work to be done now and be done right.

Our buildings are sixty years old and though we do not look or wish for things to happen, we realize that when they do, events will inconvenience cooperators and disrupt our normal routines, until repairs are complete. Our pipes and sewer lines, as we all know, are mostly behind our apartment walls or underground and cannot be checked without digging up our property or breaking everyone’s kitchen and bathroom walls. This prohibitive cost and destruction are things that we will of course not subject our cooperators to.

We hope you enjoy the repaired laundry room and apologize for the discomfort this outage has caused. We will work to keep the new laundry room clean and trouble free for your use for the next sixty years!

Thank you for your patience and we very much appreciate your support and understanding during this repair period.

Who’s next?

The emergency repair work in building 4 has left some cooperators wondering whether it’s an isolated incident or a cry for help from our 60-year-old infrastructure.

Is building 2 next?

Cracked concrete exposing re-bar.
Cracked concrete exposing re-bar.
A chunk of loose concrete.
A chunk of loose concrete.
Sheet metal covering the floor.
Sheet metal covering the floor.

The laundry room in building 2 now has sheet metal covering a large corner of the floor under the bulletin board. Has some excavation been done to test the sewer pipes or the integrity of the concrete floor?

And what about the broken concrete and exposed re-bar supporting the washing machines? That’s been there for a long time, but now all these cracks start to look more ominous.

Directors and management should make an effort right away to address the huge cost of repairs in building 4, assess the structural integrity of the other three buildings, and reassure cooperators that it’s safe to do their laundry.

Building 4 laundry room repair to cost $200k+

Board member Lee Berman has provided a few more details about the emergency repair of the laundry room in building 4.

Apparently the first sign of trouble was raw sewage leaking into the pump room. The leak was traced back to pipes underneath the laundry room. After excavation was started, it was revealed that leaking sewage had washed away some of the sand and earth supporting the laundry room’s reinforced concrete floor, necessitating its replacement.

According to Lee, the board was recently informed that the cost of repair will be north of $200,000.

So far unknown is whether sewer pipes under any of the other three buildings are suffering from the same problem.